Spinoza Bibliography

Published by the Spinoza-Gesellschaft e.V. and directed by Manfred Walther

Quick Search

Search
Report bibliographic entry
Report bibliographic correction
Links
Contact
Imprint

Recent Entries > Detailed View (Table view)

Default view

Eintrag Nr. 22376
Literature type Articles
Author Newlands, Samuel
Title Regis' Sweeping and Costly Anti-Spinozism
Title of magazine / anthology Journal of the History of Philosophy
Counting 62, 2
Year 2024
Pages 211-238
Language English
Thematic areas Metaphysics / ontology, Contemporaries and context, Reception history
Subject E
Subject (individuals) Regis, Pierre-Sylvain
Autopsy no
Complete bibliographic evaluation no
German commentary "Pierre-Sylvain Regis, once a well-known defender of Cartesianism, offers an unusually rich and innovative refutation of Spinoza. While many of his early modern contemporaries raised narrower objections to particular claims in Spinoza’s Ethics, Regis develops a broader anti-Spinozistic position, one that threatens the very core of Spinoza’s metaphysical ambitions and offers a philosophically robust alternative. However, as with any far-reaching philosophical commitment, Regis’s gambit comes with substantive costs of its own, including creating instabilities within the core of his own philosophical system. Far from diminishing the significance of Regis’s anti-Spinozism, this critical appraisal helps us better appreciate both the conceptual pull of Spinozism within early modern metaphysics and one sweeping, albeit costly way of escaping its orbit". (abstract)
English commentary "Pierre-Sylvain Regis, once a well-known defender of Cartesianism, offers an unusually rich and innovative refutation of Spinoza. While many of his early modern contemporaries raised narrower objections to particular claims in Spinoza’s Ethics, Regis develops a broader anti-Spinozistic position, one that threatens the very core of Spinoza’s metaphysical ambitions and offers a philosophically robust alternative. However, as with any far-reaching philosophical commitment, Regis’s gambit comes with substantive costs of its own, including creating instabilities within the core of his own philosophical system. Far from diminishing the significance of Regis’s anti-Spinozism, this critical appraisal helps us better appreciate both the conceptual pull of Spinozism within early modern metaphysics and one sweeping, albeit costly way of escaping its orbit". (abstract)
Link to this page

Back

Have you discovered inaccurate information?

Report bibliographic correction / completion

Top of page Back to top of page