Spinoza Bibliografie

Hrsg. von der Spinoza-Gesellschaft e.V. unter Leitung von Manfred Walther

Schnellsuche

Suche
Bibliografischen Fund melden
Korrekturvorschlag melden
Links
Kontakt
Impressum

Aktuelle Einträge > Detailansicht (Tabellarische Ansicht)

Normalansicht

Eintrag Nr. 18276
Literatursorte Aufsätze
Verfasser Wells, Robert
Titel The Multitude
Untertitel Ambivalence and Antagonism
Titel Zeitschrift / Sammelband Rethinking Marxism
Zählung 26, 2,3
Jahr 2014
Seiten 239-251
Spinoza-Erwähnung s. Kommentar/commentary
Sprache englisch
Sachgebiete Politische und Rechtsphilosophie, Rezeptionsgeschichte, Materialismus / Marxismus
Behandelte Personen Hardt, Michael ; Negri, Antonio ; Virno, Paolo
Autopsie nein
Vollständig bibliografisch ausgewertet nein
Kommentar deutsch "Ambivalence and antagonism are constitutive of the multitude and its relations. Such attributes tend to complicate how the multitude is conceived and how it operates; these complications, in turn, often lead to inconsistencies and contradictions in terms of the multitude's signification and application. This article argues that the various complications that arise specifically with respect to ambivalence, antagonism, and the multitude—primarily in the works of the contemporary postautonomist thinkers Paolo Virno, Antonio Negri, and Michael Hardt—need to be reformulated, not removed. It also genealogically traces ambivalence and antagonism back to Spinoza's initial conceptions of the multitude" (abstract).
Kommentar englisch "Ambivalence and antagonism are constitutive of the multitude and its relations. Such attributes tend to complicate how the multitude is conceived and how it operates; these complications, in turn, often lead to inconsistencies and contradictions in terms of the multitude's signification and application. This article argues that the various complications that arise specifically with respect to ambivalence, antagonism, and the multitude—primarily in the works of the contemporary postautonomist thinkers Paolo Virno, Antonio Negri, and Michael Hardt—need to be reformulated, not removed. It also genealogically traces ambivalence and antagonism back to Spinoza's initial conceptions of the multitude" (abstract).
Link zu dieser Seite

Zurück

Haben Sie Fehler in unseren Angaben entdeckt?

Korrekturvorschlag oder Unvollständigkeit melden

Seitenanfang Zurück zum Seitenanfang