| Literature type | Articles |
| Author | Steiner, Stephan |
| Title | Theismuskritik |
| Subtitle | Argumente für einen religiösen Naturalismus im Anschluss an Spinoza |
| Title of magazine / anthology | Gott oder Natur : Perspektiven nach Spinoza |
| Editor (surname first) | Honnacker, Ana; Ruf, Matthias (Hrsg./Ed.) |
| Place published | Münster |
| Publisher | LIT |
| Year | 2015 |
| Pages | [121]-132 |
| Pages in total (of the volume) | XIII, 164, (2) |
| Series ; volume | Philosophie aktuell ; 12 |
| Mention of Spinoza | 122, 123, 126, 131 |
| Language | German |
| Thematic areas | Theology / biblical hermeneutics / philosophy of religion, Literary or artistic representation |
| Subject | E |
| Subject (individuals) | Johnston, Mark |
| Autopsy | yes |
| Complete bibliographic evaluation | yes |
| German commentary | In dem "erbitterte(n) Streit zwischen szientistischen Naturalisten und religiösen Anti-Naturalisten" (S. 122) geht Spinoza, so der Autor im Anschluss an Mark Johnston, einen dritten Weg. Spinozas "Theismuskritik stellt demnach", so Mark Johnston, "weniger einen ruchlosen Atheismus" dar, [...] sondern sollte stattdessen [...] als Versuch einer Purifizierug des wahren Glaubens gelesen werden." (S. 126) |
| English commentary | In the "bitter quarrel between scientistic naturalists and religious anti-naturalists" (p. 122), Spinoza takes, according to the author, in follwing Mark Johnston, a third way. Spinoza's "critique of theism presents", according to Mark Johnston, "not an abominable atheism but should be read, instead, as an attempt of purifying true belief." (p. 136) |
| Link to this page | http://spinoza.hab.de/detail.php?id=14078&LANG=EN |
Have you discovered inaccurate information?
