Spinoza Bibliography

Published by the Spinoza-Gesellschaft e.V. and directed by Manfred Walther

Quick Search

Search
Report bibliographic entry
Report bibliographic correction
Links
Contact
Imprint

Recent Entries > Detailed View (Table view)

Default view

Eintrag Nr. 10784
Literature type Articles
Author Boehm, Omri
Title The first antinomy and Spinoza
Title of magazine / anthology The British journal for the history of philosophy
Counting 19, 4
Year 2011
Pages 683-710
Language English
Thematic areas Metaphysics / ontology, Epistemology / methodology / philosophy of mind, Reception history
Subject (individuals) Kant, Immanuel
Autopsy no
Complete bibliographic evaluation no
German commentary "In the first part of the paper, I argue that the first Antinomy, debating the age and size of the world, already reflects Kant's confrontation with Spinozist metaphysics. Specifically, the position articulated in the Antithesis – according to which the world is infinite and uncreated – is Spinozist, not Leibnizian, as commonly assumed. In the second part of the paper, I raise the chief Spinozist challenge to the Antinomy, arising from Spinoza's reliance on a cosmological `totum analyticum' – an infinite whole which is prior to its parts. In conclusion, I begin to elaborate a defence of the Kantian position, confronting Spinoza's infinite whole with Kant's account of the absolutely infinite in his discussion of the sublime." (aus dem abstract)
English commentary "In the first part of the paper, I argue that the first Antinomy, debating the age and size of the world, already reflects Kant's confrontation with Spinozist metaphysics. Specifically, the position articulated in the Antithesis – according to which the world is infinite and uncreated – is Spinozist, not Leibnizian, as commonly assumed. In the second part of the paper, I raise the chief Spinozist challenge to the Antinomy, arising from Spinoza's reliance on a cosmological `totum analyticum' – an infinite whole which is prior to its parts. In conclusion, I begin to elaborate a defence of the Kantian position, confronting Spinoza's infinite whole with Kant's account of the absolutely infinite in his discussion of the sublime." (from tne abstract)
Link to this page

Back

Have you discovered inaccurate information?

Report bibliographic correction / completion

Top of page Back to top of page