Literature type | Articles |
Author | Renz, Ursula |
Title | Epistemic Autonomy in Descartes, Spinoza and Kant |
Subtitle | The Value of Thinking for Oneself |
Title of magazine / anthology | Spinoza and Relational Autonomy : Being with Others |
Editor (surname first) | Armstrong, Aurelia ; Green, Keith ; Sangiacomo, Andrea (Hrsg./eds.) |
Place published | Edinburgh |
Publisher | Edinburgh University Press |
Year | 2019 |
Pages | [33]-49 |
Pages in total (of the volume) | XI, 211 |
Contains bibliography | 48-49 |
Mention of Spinoza | 2. Individualism and Perfectionalism and the Mature Spinoza: 36-41 ; ferner/further: 33-34, 41-42 |
Language | English |
Thematic areas | Epistemology / methodology / philosophy of mind, Ethics, Theory of society |
Subject | E, Ep. |
Subject (individuals) | Descartes, René ; Kant, Immanuel |
Autopsy | yes |
Complete bibliographic evaluation | yes |
German commentary | "... we should focus on these accounts" - i.e. "for maintaining epistemic individualism" - "that are most likley tp provide good reasons for individualism, and these are to be found, I think, in the rational rather than in the empiristic tradition. ... In the end, it will turn out, perhaps somewhat surprisingly, that both Spinoza and Kant, while adopting a rather critical stance toward the Cartesian concept formation, remained loyal to what may be considered Descartes' reasons for his epistemic individualism." |
English commentary | "... we should focus on these accounts" - i.e. "for maintaining epistemic individualism" - "that are most likley tp provide good reasons for individualism, and these are to be found, I think, in the rational rather than in the empiristic tradition. ... In the end, it will turn out, perhaps somewhat surprisingly, that both Spinoza and Kant, while adopting a rather critical stance toward the Cartesian concept formation, remained loyal to what may be considered Descartes' reasons for his epistemic individualism." |
Link to this page | http://spinoza.hab.de/detail.php?id=20052&LANG=EN |
Have you discovered inaccurate information?