Spinoza Bibliography

Published by the Spinoza-Gesellschaft e.V. and directed by Manfred Walther

Quick Search

Search
Report bibliographic entry
Report bibliographic correction
Links
Contact
Imprint

Recent Entries > Detailed View (Table view)

Default view

Eintrag Nr. 19995
Literature type Articles
Author Sangiacomo, Andrea
Title Aristotle, Heereboord and the polemical target of Spinoza's critique of final causes
Title of magazine / anthology Journal of the History of Philosophy
Counting 54, 3
Year 2016
Pages 395-420
Language English
Thematic areas Metaphysics / ontology, Previous history (e.g. Descartes, Stoicism), Contemporaries and context, Comparison of theories
Subject E
Subject (individuals) Aristoteles [Aristotle] ; Heereboord, Adriaan ; Suàrez, Francisco
Autopsy yes
Complete bibliographic evaluation no
German commentary "This paper aims to identify the polemical target of Spinoza’s critique of final causes in the Appendix to the first part of the Ethics.i assess Spinoza’s arguments on the background of a comparison between Aristotle’s own account of unthought-ful teleology and Adriaan Heereboord’s account of final causes proposed in his Meletemata Philosophica (1654). Although Heereboord explicitly presents himself as an Aristotelian and an anti-scholastic, his view on final causes is at odds with that of Aristotle and can be rather traced back to Suárez. The paper proves that Spinoza’s arguments are effective against Heereboord’s view, but not against Aristotle’s." (abstract, p. 395)
English commentary "This paper aims to identify the polemical target of Spinoza’s critique of final causes in the Appendix to the first part of the Ethics.i assess Spinoza’s arguments on the background of a comparison between Aristotle’s own account of unthought-ful teleology and Adriaan Heereboord’s account of final causes proposed in his Meletemata Philosophica (1654). Although Heereboord explicitly presents himself as an Aristotelian and an anti-scholastic, his view on final causes is at odds with that of Aristotle and can be rather traced back to Suárez. The paper proves that Spinoza’s arguments are effective against Heereboord’s view, but not against Aristotle’s." (abstract, p. 395)
URL http://https://muse.jhu.edu/article/628206/pdf
Link to this page

Back

Have you discovered inaccurate information?

Report bibliographic correction / completion

Top of page Back to top of page