Spinoza Bibliography

Published by the Spinoza-Gesellschaft e.V. and directed by Manfred Walther

Quick Search

Search
Report bibliographic entry
Report bibliographic correction
Links
Contact
Imprint

Recent Entries > Detailed View (Table view)

Default view

Eintrag Nr. 19852
Literature type Articles
Author Sala, Rosa M.
Title Suma sin fin
Title of magazine / anthology Spinoza y la Antropología en la Modernidad
Editor (surname first) Cámara, María Luisa de la ; Carvajal, Julián (Hrsg./eds.)
Place published Hildesheim
Publisher Olms
Year 2017
Pages [299]-307
Pages in total (of the volume) 407
Series ; volume EUROPEA MEMORIA : Studien und Texte zur Geschichte der europäischen Ideen, Reihe I: Studien ; 123
Contains summary in English
Language Spanish
Thematic areas Metaphysics / ontology, Epistemology / methodology / philosophy of mind, Anthropology / psychology / doctrine of affections / body and mind
Subject E, TTP
Autopsy yes
Complete bibliographic evaluation yes
German commentary "Negation is fogeign to Spinoza's universe. Negation in any of its various names is always secondary and mus be justified. However, the positivity of the substance is different from the positivity of the modes, since substance and modes move in two irreducibel ontological registers. Humans are finite modes and therefore fall within the scope of diachrony (duration) but they are also able to consider infinity and synchrony (eternity). Such oscillations between the ephimeral and the timeless, between the particular and the universal allow them to understand not only themselves but also the structure of being in a rational way (which by the way can free them from superstition, whether theological of teleological)." (abstract, p. 299)
English commentary "Negation is fogeign to Spinoza's universe. Negation in any of its various names is always secondary and mus be justified. However, the positivity of the substance is different from the positivity of the modes, since substance and modes move in two irreducibel ontological registers. Humans are finite modes and therefore fall within the scope of diachrony (duration) but they are also able to consider infinity and synchrony (eternity). Such oscillations between the ephimeral and the timeless, between the particular and the universal allow them to understand not only themselves but also the structure of being in a rational way (which by the way can free them from superstition, whether theological of teleological)." (Abstract, p. 299)
Link to this page

Back

Have you discovered inaccurate information?

Report bibliographic correction / completion

Top of page Back to top of page