Literature type | Articles |
Author | Jiménez Sánchez, J. José |
Title | If Bentham had read... |
Title of magazine / anthology | Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie |
Counting | 100, 1 |
Year | 2014 |
Pages | 94-111 |
Mention of Spinoza | Ja/Yes |
Language | English |
Thematic areas | Theory of society, Philosophy of politics and law, Comparison of theories |
Subject (individuals) | Hobbes, Thomas ; Bentham, Jeremy |
Autopsy | no |
Complete bibliographic evaluation | no |
German commentary | "The difference between the utilitarian approach and that of Spinoza is his special conception of natural law, which leads him to maintain that it can only be defended where men have rights in common, that is, where there is civil order ,making the preservation of our being the justification and limit of the institutionalizaton of the civil oder ..." (from the abtract) |
English commentary | "The difference between the utilitarian approach and that of Spinoza is his special conception of natural law, which leads him to maintain that it can only be defended where men have rights in common, that is, where there is civil order ,making the preservation of our being the justification and limit of the institutionalizaton of the civil oder ..." (from the abtract) |
Link to this page | http://spinoza.hab.de/detail.php?id=18118&LANG=EN |
Have you discovered inaccurate information?