Spinoza Bibliography

Published by the Spinoza-Gesellschaft e.V. and directed by Manfred Walther

Quick Search

Search
Report bibliographic entry
Report bibliographic correction
Links
Contact
Imprint

Recent Entries > Detailed View (Table view)

Default view

Eintrag Nr. 13054
Literature type Articles
Author Fraenkel, Carlos
Title Could Spinoza Have Presented the 'Ethics' as the True Content of the Bible?
Title of magazine / anthology Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy
Counting 4
Editor (surname first) Garber, Daniel ; Nadler, Steven (Hrsg./Ed.)
Place published Oxford
Publisher Clarendon
Year 2008
Pages [1]-50
Pages in total (of the volume) X, 268
Language English
Thematic areas Ethics, Theology / biblical hermeneutics / philosophy of religion, Previous history (e.g. Descartes, Stoicism), Contemporaries and context
Subject KV, PPC/CM, TTP
Subject (individuals) Bliyenbergh, Willem van; Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm ; Maimonides, Moses; Meyer, Lodewijk
Autopsy yes
Complete bibliographic evaluation yes
German commentary "Meine Hauptthese ist, dass diese Inkonsistenz" - zwischen seinem Argument im TTP, dass "die Schrift keine Wahrheit enthält", einerseits, und mehreren Stellen in verschiedenen Werken, "in denen er der Schrift einen wahren Kern zuschreibt", andererseits - "am besten durch die Annahme erklärt werden kann, dass Spinoza zwei Projekte verfolgt, die zu versöhnen er nicht in der Lage ist: er will Religion als einen Ersatz für Philosophie nutzen, der die Grundlage für das beste Leben für Nicht-Philosophen bereitstellt, und er will den Wahrheitsanspruch der Religion zurückweisen, um die Freiheit zu philosophieren zu verteidigen" (S. 1-2).
English commentary "My main thesis is that this inconsistency" - between his argument in the TTP, that "Scripture contains no truth", one the one hand, and the various passages in different works "in which he attributes a true core to Scripture", on the other hand - "is best explained by assuming that Spinoza is commited to two projects that he was unable to reconcile: he wants to use religon as a replacement of philosophy that provides the basis for the best life accessible to non-philosphers and he wants to refute religion's claim to truth in order to defend the feedom to philosophize" (p. 1-2).
Link to this page

Back

Have you discovered inaccurate information?

Report bibliographic correction / completion

Top of page Back to top of page