Filip A. A. Buyse:
Boyle, Spinoza and Glauber: on the philosophical redintegration of saltpeter : A reply to Antonio Clericuzio

In: Foundation of Chemistry / E. Scerri. Springer, 2019: 20. - (Found Chem DOI 10.1007/s10698-019-09345-4)

Literature type: Articles
Language: English
Thematic areas: Contemporaries and context, Miscellaneous
Subject (individuals): Boyle, Robert ; Glauber, Johann Rudolph

English commentary: The so-called ‘redintegration experiment’ is traditionally at the center of the comments on the supposed Boyle/Spinoza controversy. A. Clericuzio influentially argued (criticizing R.A. & M.B. Hall’s interpretation) in his publications that, in De nitro, Boyle accounted for the ‘redintegration’ of saltpeter on the grounds of the chemical properties of corpuscles and “did not make any attempt to deduce them from mechanical principles”. By way of contrast, this paper argues that with his De nitro Boyle wanted to illustrate and promote his new corpuscular or mechanical philosophy, and that he made significant attempts to explain the phenomena in terms of mechanical qualities. Boyle had borrowed the ‘redintegration experiment’ from R. Glauber and used it in an attempt to demonstrate that his philosophy was superior to the Peripatetic and Paracelsian theory. Consequently, Clericuzio’s characterization of the Boyle/Spinoza controversy as a discussion between a strict mechanical philosopher and a chemist is problematic and a wider view of Spinoza’s interpretation and its context gives a fairer picture.URL: http://https://www.academia.edu/38351640/Boyle_Spinoza_and_Glauber_On_the_Philosophical_Redintegration_of_Saltpeter_A_Reply_to_Antonio_Clericuzio

Link to this page: http://spinoza.hab.de/detail.php?id=19339&LANG=EN